AI Showreel consulting-grade analysis, for everyone FR
← The index
Proof C Mixed signals

Colgate-Palmolive

genAI video generation on a repeatable volume-variety-velocity model

IndustryCPG & D2CLeverAcquisitionFamilyGenerationImplementationMartech platformStageconsideration
Pattern proven in 8 industries still untouched in Media & entertainment, Travel & hospitality, Food & beverage +4 See the pattern map
4 a 6x plus vite
Video production speed
"two consumer-ready video ads 4X to 6X faster" S1

Colgate-Palmolive produced two Hill's Pet Nutrition video ads with Google Veo and BCG 4 to 6 times faster than usual, at a significantly lower cost per concept and with equal or better consideration, on a repeatable volume-variety-velocity model meant to be extended.

Objective

Prove a repeatable content production model (volume, variety, velocity) that produces video ads faster and cheaper, without losing measured effectiveness, in order to extend it across the portfolio.

The deployment

Colgate-Palmolive ran a genAI content pilot with Google and BCG for its Hill's Pet Nutrition division. Using Google Veo, a cross-functional team (Hill's marketers, in-house specialists, BCG, Google technologists) produced two consumer-ready video ads, 4 to 6 times faster than the usual production lead time, at a significantly lower cost per concept and with consideration equal to or better than usual creative. The pilot was built around the three Vs of content: volume, variety, velocity. Colgate-Palmolive positions this approach as a repeatable model to extend to other brands, in a context where the company is deploying genAI marketing more broadly (consumer insights, synthetic consumer twins, team upskilling via Google Workspace with Gemini).

Results Proof C

4 a 6x plus vite
Video production speed
"two consumer-ready video ads 4X to 6X faster" S1
nettement plus bas
Cost per concept
"significantly lower costs per concept" S1
egale ou superieure
Consideration vs usual creative
"same or better consideration lift compared to business-as-usual creative" S1

Figures published by Google (Think with Google customer story) naming Colgate-Palmolive and its executive, corroborated by press and third-party analysis (MIT Sloan) of the group's genAI marketing. An extended-pilot type case, no financial results, hence C.

How it works

Documented architecture
si consideration validee Equipe Hill's + BCG +Google Generation video Google Veo Videos publicitairespretes a diffuser Test consideration / coutpar concept Media digital

The stack in detail

  • llm Google Veo Google's video generation model, used for the two Hill's spots, including the realistic animal characters
  • llm Gemini Google's LLM used in the group's genAI approach, notably for ideation and team upskilling
  • plateforme Google Workspace avec Gemini work environment where the group deploys Gemini to upskill teams
  • integrateur Boston Consulting Group framing of the pilot and participation in the cross-functional team

How it runs, concretely

For ops teams
CadencePer campaign, on a repeatable model; generation of video concepts in days rather than weeks.
Operated byCross-functional Colgate-Palmolive team (Hill's marketers, in-house specialists) with Google and BCG.
  1. 1
    Framing the model marketing / BCG

    Definition of the three Vs (volume, variety, velocity) and the Hill's scope with BCG and Google.

  2. 2
    Video generation AI / creative team

    Production of two consumer-ready videos via Google Veo, with realistic animal characters.

  3. 3
    Effectiveness test insights / marketing

    Measurement of consideration against usual creative and of cost per concept.

  4. 4
    Extending the model marketing

    Reuse of the repeatable model on other brands in the portfolio.

The signal that drives it

The consideration measured on the generated creative, compared to usual creative. If consideration drops, the speed gain does not offset the loss of effectiveness.

How your customers perceive this type of use

Sourced studies

Un ecart net separe les annonceurs des consommateurs : 77% des annonceurs voient l'IA positivement contre 38% des consommateurs (Yahoo/Publicis, 2024). Les mesures implicites confirment le rejet declare : en EEG, les pubs generees par IA produisent une activation memorielle plus faible que les pubs traditionnelles et sont decrites comme agacantes, ennuyeuses et confuses (NIQ, 2024). La disclosure a un effet ambivalent : elle augmente fortement la confiance quand elle est remarquee (Yahoo/Publicis), mais 27% des jeunes consommateurs disent faire moins confiance a une entreprise dont la pub est creee par IA (IAB, 2024).

77% vs 38%
Annonceurs qui percoivent l'IA positivement, contre 38% des consommateurs (2024)
72%
Consommateurs qui estiment que l'IA rend difficile de savoir quel contenu est authentique (2024)
+96%
Lift de confiance globale envers l'entreprise quand la mention IA d'une pub est remarquee (avec +47% d'attrait de la pub et +73% de credibilite de la pub) (2024)

Acceptance conditions

  • Une disclosure visible : quand la mention IA est remarquee, la confiance globale envers l'entreprise augmente de 96% (Yahoo/Publicis 2024)
  • Une qualite visuelle suffisante : les visuels IA de basse qualite augmentent l'effort cognitif et distraient du message (NIQ 2024)

Red lines

  • Le contenu IA non declare puis identifie : 72% des consommateurs disent que l'IA rend l'authenticite difficile a etablir (Yahoo/Publicis 2024) et les marques utilisant des pubs IA sont plus souvent jugees inauthentiques ou non ethiques par les consommateurs que par les dirigeants (IAB 2024)
  • Les mannequins et personnes generes par IA : 46% des consommateurs n'en veulent pas dans la publicite, l'inquietude premiere etant les standards de beaute irrealistes (Attest 2025)

Sources: Yahoo / Publicis Media (terrain Ebco) 2024 · IAB (avec Attest) 2024 · NIQ (NielsenIQ) 2024 · Attest 2025

See full acceptance: by country, by use, by generation

How to replicate

Inference, not sourced

Data prerequisites

  • brand briefs and product references
  • a consideration measurement protocol
  • history of production costs for comparison

Org prerequisites

  • cross-functional creation / insights / tech team
  • documented repeatable model (three Vs)
  • an effectiveness safeguard before industrialization

Possible stack

  • video generation tool (Google Veo type)
  • LLM for ideation (Gemini type)
  • brand safety and human validation
Team to operate1 pilot marketer + 1 genAI creative + 1 insights profile, with the tool vendor and a consultancy in support

The plan, step by step

  1. Step 1
    Frame the three Vs model (volume, variety, velocity) and the pilot scope on one brand.Deliverable: Framing note with speed, cost, and effectiveness objectives
  2. Step 2
    Assemble the cross-functional team (marketing, creatives, insights, tech) and open access to the generation tools.Deliverable: Team and production environment ready
  3. Step 3
    Generate two consumer-ready video concepts, keeping human validation on each shot.Deliverable: Two finalized spots, lead time and cost per concept measured
  4. Step 4
    Test consideration against usual creative and compare cost per concept to history.Deliverable: Quantified pilot review (speed, cost, consideration)
  5. Step 5
    Document the repeatable model to extend it to other brands in the portfolio.Deliverable: Validated internal extension playbook

First step: Choose one brand and generate two video concepts, then test them on consideration against usual production.

Sources

  1. S1 Colgate-Palmolive's gen-AI marketing pilot Interested party business.google.com · 2024 · accessed 2026-07-11 archive pending
  2. S2 The GenAI Focus Shifts to Innovation at Colgate-Palmolive Secondary sloanreview.mit.edu · 2024 · accessed 2026-07-11 archive pending
  3. S3 Hill's Pet Nutrition drives Colgate-Palmolive growth; Uses AI for marketing Secondary petfoodindustry.com · 2024 · accessed 2026-07-11 archive pending