AI Showreel consulting-grade analysis, for everyone FR
← The index
Proof B Live confirmed

Ray-Ban

fully automated paid campaign (bidding, targeting, placement) connected to the product catalog

IndustryRetail & e-commerceLeverAcquisitionFamilyOptimization / automationImplementationMartech platformStagepurchase
Pattern proven in 8 industries still untouched in Media & entertainment, Travel & hospitality, Food & beverage +5 See the pattern map
+42%
ROAS vs manual management
"42% higher return on ad spend (ROAS)" S1

Ray-Ban ran its sales campaigns on TikTok via Smart+ Catalog Ads (AI-driven media buying) and achieved 42% higher ROAS, a 50% lower CPA, and a 47% higher conversion rate compared with manual management.

Key points

  • Fully AI-automated sales campaign connected to the product catalog.
  • TikTok Smart+ Catalog Ads tool, with the Symphony suite and the pixel.
  • ROAS up 42%, CPA down 50%, conversion up 47%.
  • Evidence B, status confirmed on a standard TikTok product.

Objective

Sell eyewear directly during the US summer peak without multiplying manual campaign management, by letting TikTok automation seek buyers and serve catalog products.

The deployment

Ray-Ban ran its sales campaigns on TikTok via Smart+ Catalog Ads, TikTok's automated format. The advertiser supplies the product catalog and a performance objective; the platform's AI manages targeting, bidding, placements, and creative selection, then dynamically serves the right product to each user. Ray-Ban activated this approach in the US market during the summer months, a period of high demand for sunglasses. Compared with manual management, the switch to automation produced a 50 percent lower cost per acquisition, a 47 percent higher conversion rate, and 42 percent higher ROAS. This is a case of media-buying optimization and automation, not creative generation: the AI arbitrates budget and targeting, it does not build the ad.

Results Proof B

+42%
ROAS vs manual management
"42% higher return on ad spend (ROAS)" S1
-50%
Cost per acquisition (CPA)
"50% decrease in Cost Per Acquisition" S1
+47%
Conversion rate
"conversion rate skyrocketed by 47%" S1

Quantified TikTok platform case study citing Ray-Ban and its Performance Marketing Manager by name; interested official source, hence B. The Smart+ product is confirmed by TikTok's launch announcement.

How it works

Inferred typical approach

The internal detail is not public. Here is a proven approach that leads to the same result, to adapt to your stack.

conversions renvoyees pour reoptimiserobjectif + budget Catalogue produit(lunettes) Automatisation enchères /ciblage / creative TikTok Smart+ Catalog Ads Diffusion TikTok (feed) Signal de conversion(pixel + CAPI) Equipe acquisitionRay-Ban

The stack in detail

  • plateforme TikTok Smart+ Catalog Ads TikTok automated campaign: targeting, bidding, placements, and creative selection managed by AI from the catalog.
  • plateforme TikTok Symphony TikTok's AI suite cited in the case's stack.
  • outil Catalogue produit TikTok Product feed (eyewear) connected to TikTok to dynamically serve the right item to each user.
  • outil TikTok Pixel + Events API Conversion signal (purchase) reported to the platform; without it, optimization runs blind.

How it runs, concretely

For ops teams
CadenceContinuous, in real time: bidding and targeting are recomputed on every impression over the whole campaign duration.
Operated byThe brand's acquisition / performance marketing team, which feeds the catalog and sets the objective; day-to-day arbitration is delegated to TikTok.
  1. 1
    Catalog connection e-commerce / marketing team

    The product feed (eyewear) is connected to TikTok to serve dynamic ads.

  2. 2
    Objective definition acquisition team

    The brand sets a conversion or ROAS objective and a budget; the rest is left to Smart+.

  3. 3
    Automatic optimization AI (TikTok Smart+)

    The AI chooses audiences, placements, bids, and creatives, and serves the product suited to each user.

  4. 4
    Reading and budget arbitration acquisition team

    The team tracks ROAS and CPA, adjusts the budget and catalog, no longer micro-manages the bids.

The signal that drives it

The conversion event reported to TikTok (purchase via pixel and CAPI). If the purchase signal is missing or poorly attributed, the AI optimizes blind and performance drops.

How your customers perceive this type of use

Sourced studies

Le pricing algorithmique est le terrain le plus inflammable : 68% des consommateurs disent se sentir leses quand les marques utilisent le pricing dynamique et 80% jugent plus dignes de confiance les marques aux prix constants (Gartner, 2024). L'equite percue varie selon le secteur : le pricing dynamique n'est juge juste que par 33% a 40% des repondants selon qu'il s'agit de concerts ou de cinemas (YouGov, 17 marches). Le prix personnalise par les donnees individuelles est le plus rejete : 47% des Americains s'y opposent fermement (Consumer Reports, 2024).

68%
Consommateurs qui se sentent leses (taken advantage of) quand les marques utilisent le pricing dynamique (2024)
80%
Consommateurs d'accord pour dire que les marques aux prix constants sont plus dignes de confiance (2024)
79%
Consommateurs ayant vecu des situations de prix inattendues sur un an (surge pricing, frais caches, hausses imprevues) (2024)

Acceptance conditions

  • La constance des prix comme signal de confiance : 80% jugent plus fiables les marques aux prix stables (Gartner 2024)
  • Le secteur conditionne l'equite percue : le pricing dynamique est mieux tolere pour les cinemas (40% le jugent juste) que pour les concerts (33%) (YouGov 2024)

Red lines

  • Le pricing dynamique percu comme abus : 68% se sentent leses (Gartner 2024)
  • Le prix individualise a partir des donnees personnelles : 47% d'opposition ferme (Consumer Reports 2024)
  • Les frais caches et hausses imprevues, vecus par 79% des consommateurs sur un an et associes a la perte de confiance (Gartner 2024)

Sources: Gartner 2024 · YouGov 2024 · Consumer Reports 2024

See full acceptance: by country, by use, by generation

How to replicate

Inference, not sourced

Data prerequisites

  • structured product catalog
  • TikTok pixel + CAPI with a reliable purchase event

Org prerequisites

  • dedicated TikTok media budget
  • acceptance of ceding fine-grained control to automation

Possible stack

  • TikTok Smart+ Catalog Ads
  • e-commerce catalog connector
Team to operate1 media buyer + 1 e-commerce integrator for the catalog feed and the Events API.

The plan, step by step

  1. Step 1
    Connect the product catalog and the tracking (pixel + Events API) with a reliable purchase event.Deliverable: Validated product feed and a purchase that reports into TikTok Ads.
  2. Step 2
    Launch a Smart+ Catalog Ads campaign with a ROAS or conversion objective and a test budget.Deliverable: Automated campaign in delivery.
  3. Step 3
    Let the learning phase run, track ROAS and CPA without micro-managing the bids.Deliverable: Stabilized read vs a reference manual campaign.
  4. Step 4
    Arbitrate: scale the budget, adjust the catalog or the objective based on performance.Deliverable: Budget decision and documented management rules.

First step: Connect the product catalog and the purchase event, then launch a Smart+ Catalog Ads campaign against a ROAS objective.

Sources

  1. S1 How Ray-Ban Drove Sales With Smart+ Catalog Ads Interested party ads.tiktok.com · 2025 · accessed 2026-07-11 archive pending
  2. S2 Automate, Measure and Maximize: TikTok Is Building For The Future With New Performance Advertising Solutions (Smart+) Interested party newsroom.tiktok.com · 2024-10 · accessed 2026-07-11 archive pending