AI Showreel consulting-grade analysis, for everyone FR
← The index
Proof A Live confirmed

Pinterest

full-funnel AI ad suite (automated ROAS bidding, new-customer prioritization, budgets and targeting managed by the algorithm)

IndustryMedia & entertainmentLeverMonetizationFamilyOptimization / automationImplementationMartech platformStagepurchase
Pattern proven in 4 industries still untouched in Banking, insurance & fintech, Luxury & beauty, CPG & D2C +9 See the pattern map
22%
Lower-funnel retail revenue via ROAS bidding
"22% of our lower funnel retail revenue now flows through ROAS bidding" S2

In 2025, Pinterest's Performance+ AI ad suite carried about 30% of lower-funnel revenue, with +64% new-customer conversions via New Customer Acquisition and +28% ROAS for SMB advertisers, built on the in-house recommendation models OmniSage and PinFM.

Key points

  • Full-funnel AI ad suite automating bidding, targeting, and budget (Performance+).
  • ROAS bidding and New Customer Acquisition blocks, in-house models OmniSage and PinFM.
  • About 30% of lower-funnel revenue automated, +64% new-customer conversions.
  • Evidence A, status confirmed via the 2025 earnings calls.

Objective

Route a growing share of Pinterest's lower-funnel ad revenue through an AI-automated ad suite, improving ROAS and new-customer acquisition for advertisers while strengthening the engagement that feeds monetizable inventory.

The deployment

Pinterest built Performance+, an ad suite where the algorithm takes over a campaign's bidding, targeting, and budget. An advertiser picks an objective, lets the system optimize delivery, and can turn on two key building blocks: ROAS bidding, which optimizes on conversion value rather than plain volume, and New Customer Acquisition, which uses an advertiser-supplied list of existing customers to prioritize delivery toward net-new buyers. Underneath this ad layer run Pinterest's in-house recommendation models. OmniSage, trained on the taste graph, serves as a single signal to retrieve and rank content; PinFM, a foundational ranking model, distills a user's full history into home feed and related Pin recommendations. These models increase saves, and therefore the engagement and inventory the ad suite can then monetize. The suite launched globally in October 2024, ROAS bidding was added in the first quarter of 2025, and about 30% of lower-funnel revenue was flowing through Performance+ one year after the global launch.

Results Proof A

22%
Lower-funnel retail revenue via ROAS bidding
"22% of our lower funnel retail revenue now flows through ROAS bidding" S2
+24%
Conversion lift for retail advertisers on Performance+
"24% higher conversion lift" S2
+64%
New-customer conversions with New Customer Acquisition vs control
"new customer conversions increase by an average of 64%" S1
+28%
ROAS for SMB advertisers after delivery model update
"28% improvement in ROAS during testing for SMB advertisers" S3
+450 points de base
Sitewide saves driven by the OmniSage model
"OmniSage drove a 450 basis point lift in sitewide saves" S1
+100%
Unique shopping SKUs with a paid impression (YoY, Q3 2025)
"unique shopping SKUs with a paid ad impression grew more than 100%" S2
de 9% a 30%
Share of international revenue carried by shopping ads (2023 to Q3 2025)
"shopping ads represented just 9% of international revenue. In Q3 2025, it reached 30%" S2

Quantified results announced by the CEO on the Q3 and Q4 2025 earnings calls, corroborated by official Pinterest blogs; several concordant primary sources.

How it works

Inferred typical approach

The internal detail is not public. Here is a proven approach that leads to the same result, to adapt to your stack.

configure l'objectif et fournit les donneesdiffusion des annoncesboucle de conversion valorisee (ROAS)boucle d'engagement (saves) Taste graph et signauxd'engagement desutilisateurs Catalogue produit,conversions valorisees etliste clients de OmniSage (recommandationet ranking) OmniSage PinFM (rankingfondationnel surhistorique) PinFM Performance+ (ROASbidding, NCA, budgets etciblage automatises) Pinterest Performance+ Home feed et surfacesshopping Pinterest Annonceur / equipe growth

The stack in detail

  • plateforme Pinterest Performance+ Ad suite automating bidding, targeting, and budget
  • llm OmniSage Recommendation and ranking model trained on the Pinterest taste graph
  • llm PinFM Foundational ranking model distilling user history into the home feed
  • infra Navigator 1 Core model reducing latency and cost (about 90% less than a leading third-party model)

How it runs, concretely

For ops teams
CadenceReal-time bidding on every impression; periodic retraining of the recommendation and ranking models
Operated byOn the platform side, Pinterest's ML and ads engineering teams; on the advertiser side, a growth/paid team that sets the objective and supplies the data
  1. 1
    Supply the catalog and conversion signals advertiser / data team

    The advertiser connects its product feed and valued-conversion reporting so the system optimizes on value rather than plain clicks.

  2. 2
    Upload the list of existing customers advertiser / marketing

    To activate New Customer Acquisition, the advertiser imports its customer base; the system assigns higher value to net-new prospects and prioritizes their delivery.

  3. 3
    Let Performance+ manage bidding, targeting, and budget AI / Pinterest platform

    Once the objective is set, the algorithm automates delivery across the home feed and shopping surfaces.

  4. 4
    Feed inventory through the recommendation models AI / Pinterest ML team

    OmniSage and PinFM rank content and personalize the feed, which increases the saves and engagement the ad suite then monetizes.

The signal that drives it

The conversion value reported by the advertiser for ROAS bidding, and the list of existing customers for New Customer Acquisition. Without a valued conversion signal, bidding falls back to volume; without a customer list, new-buyer prioritization does not work.

How your customers perceive this type of use

Sourced studies

Le pricing algorithmique est le terrain le plus inflammable : 68% des consommateurs disent se sentir leses quand les marques utilisent le pricing dynamique et 80% jugent plus dignes de confiance les marques aux prix constants (Gartner, 2024). L'equite percue varie selon le secteur : le pricing dynamique n'est juge juste que par 33% a 40% des repondants selon qu'il s'agit de concerts ou de cinemas (YouGov, 17 marches). Le prix personnalise par les donnees individuelles est le plus rejete : 47% des Americains s'y opposent fermement (Consumer Reports, 2024).

68%
Consommateurs qui se sentent leses (taken advantage of) quand les marques utilisent le pricing dynamique (2024)
80%
Consommateurs d'accord pour dire que les marques aux prix constants sont plus dignes de confiance (2024)
79%
Consommateurs ayant vecu des situations de prix inattendues sur un an (surge pricing, frais caches, hausses imprevues) (2024)

Acceptance conditions

  • La constance des prix comme signal de confiance : 80% jugent plus fiables les marques aux prix stables (Gartner 2024)
  • Le secteur conditionne l'equite percue : le pricing dynamique est mieux tolere pour les cinemas (40% le jugent juste) que pour les concerts (33%) (YouGov 2024)

Red lines

  • Le pricing dynamique percu comme abus : 68% se sentent leses (Gartner 2024)
  • Le prix individualise a partir des donnees personnelles : 47% d'opposition ferme (Consumer Reports 2024)
  • Les frais caches et hausses imprevues, vecus par 79% des consommateurs sur un an et associes a la perte de confiance (Gartner 2024)

Sources: Gartner 2024 · YouGov 2024 · Consumer Reports 2024

See full acceptance: by country, by use, by generation

How to replicate

Inference, not sourced

Data prerequisites

  • Clean, up-to-date product catalog feed
  • Valued-conversion reporting (purchase value, not just clicks) via pixel/conversion API
  • Usable list of existing customers to distinguish net-new buyers

Org prerequisites

  • Marketing/data alignment on a shared definition of conversion value and new customer
  • Legal basis and GDPR consent for matching the customer list
  • Willingness to delegate bidding, targeting, and budget to the platform algorithm

Possible stack

  • Pinterest Performance+ (ROAS bidding, New Customer Acquisition)
  • Platform equivalents: Meta Advantage+ with a new-customer objective, Google Performance Max with value-based bidding and a new customer acquisition goal
  • Native platform incrementality measurement to validate the contribution
Team to operateA paid/growth lead on the advertiser side, plus a data profile for valued-conversion measurement and customer-list matching.

The plan, step by step

  1. Step 1
    Instrument conversion value rather than plain volume, so bidding optimizes on ROASDeliverable: Valued-conversion feed reported to the platform
  2. Step 2
    Build and upload the list of existing customers to prioritize net-new buyersDeliverable: Customer segment used as a reference for new-customer targeting
  3. Step 3
    Activate the automated suite on a lower-funnel objective and let the algorithm driveDeliverable: Performance+ campaign in automated delivery
  4. Step 4
    Measure incremental contribution and new-customer ROAS against a control campaignDeliverable: Read on the real uplift of automation and the new-customer block

First step: Instrument conversion value and prepare the list of existing customers: these are the two signals that make ROAS bidding and new-customer prioritization work.

Sources

  1. S1 Pinterest (PINS) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Primary fool.com · 2026-02-12 · accessed 2026-07-12 archive pending
  2. S2 Pinterest, Inc. (NYSE:PINS) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Primary insidermonkey.com · 2025-11 · accessed 2026-07-12 archive pending
  3. S3 Grow your business faster: How Pinterest Performance+ automates success for SMBs Interested party business.pinterest.com · 2026-06-15 · accessed 2026-07-12 archive pending
  4. S4 Introducing new AI and automation campaign features to support advertisers | Pinterest Newsroom Primary newsroom.pinterest.com · 2024-10-01 · accessed 2026-07-12 archive pending