AI Showreel consulting-grade analysis, for everyone FR
← The index
Proof B Mixed signals

Renault

Consolidation of multiple formats and channels into a single campaign driven by Google's machine learning (bidding, creative mix, channels) on a conversion objective

IndustryAutomotiveLeverAcquisitionFamilyOptimization / automationImplementationMartech platformStageconsideration -> lead
Pattern proven in 8 industries still untouched in Media & entertainment, Travel & hospitality, Food & beverage +5 See the pattern map
-86 %
Cost per conversion (Turkey)
"reducing our cost per conversion by 86%" S1

Renault (Turkey) cut its cost per conversion by 86% by consolidating its lead-generation campaigns into a single Google Performance Max campaign driven by machine learning; the UK entity replicated it with a CPA 67% below its target.

Key points

  • Lead-generation campaigns consolidated into a single Google Performance Max campaign.
  • Driven by Google's machine learning (bidding, creative mix, channels), lead quality imported from the CRM.
  • Cost per conversion -86% in Turkey, +1,261 leads at CPA -67% in the United Kingdom.
  • Evidence B, status mixed signals.

Objective

Lower the cost per qualified lead and stop managing one campaign per format and per channel: a single campaign, driven by Google's AI.

The deployment

In Turkey, the Renault Mais team managed its lead-generation campaigns (test drives, dealer contacts) separately by format and by platform, with the agency OMD. It consolidated everything into a single Performance Max campaign. The principle: you upload the assets - videos, images, texts - and Google's algorithm continuously decides which creative to show, on which channel among Search, YouTube, Display, Discover, Maps, and Gmail, and at what bid. Creatives that do not convert are dropped automatically. Renault Mais reports a cost per conversion divided by almost seven, or -86%. The same pattern runs elsewhere in the group: in the United Kingdom, Renault Retail Group generated 1,261 more leads at a cost 67% below its target. Since then, Performance Max has become Google's default format for this kind of acquisition.

Results Proof B

-86 %
Cost per conversion (Turkey)
"reducing our cost per conversion by 86%" S1
+1 261
Additional conversions (UK)
"an additional 1,261 conversions" S2
-67 % vs KPI
CPA vs target (UK)
"at a CPA 67% lower than their KPI" S2

Think with Google case study quantified with a named quote from a Renault Mais executive (platform bias), corroborated by an independent agency case study on another Renault entity (UK) - no confirmation in financial results.

How it works

Documented architecture
feedback qualité lead Assets : vidéos, images,textes, feed Asset groups PMax Signaux de conversion(leads qualifiés) GA4 + import offline CRM IA Google : enchères,choix de canal, rotationcréa Google Ads Performance Max Search / YouTube /Display / Discover / Maps/ Gmail Lead concessionnaire(essai, contact)

The stack in detail

  • plateforme Google Ads Performance Max Single multi-channel campaign (Search, YouTube, Display, Discover, Maps, Gmail) driven by Google's ML: bidding, creative mix, allocation.
  • outil Smart Bidding (Google) Automatic machine-learning bidding on a conversion objective.
  • outil Google Analytics (GA4) + import de conversions offline Reporting of qualified leads from dealers into Google Ads, so the algorithm learns on real conversion.
  • outil Salesforce CRM used by Renault Group to requalify leads and feed their quality back into Google.
  • integrateur OMD Renault Mais (Turkey) media agency on the Performance Max consolidation.

How it runs, concretely

For ops teams
CadenceContinuous, with a learning phase of 4 to 6 weeks at the start. Results are not judged before it has passed.
Operated byThe media team (or the agency), with the CRM/data team to feed lead quality back into Google.
  1. 1
    Define the real conversion Marketing team + dealer network

    A lead is not a completed form: it is a contact the dealer judges actionable. It is this definition that you give Google, not the click.

  2. 2
    Feed quality back from the CRM Data / CRM team

    Leads that lead to a test drive or a quote are fed back into Google Ads (offline import). The algorithm then learns to seek the right profiles, not the curious.

  3. 3
    Supply assets in volume Creative agency

    Videos, images, and hooks in quantity, to give material to test. Too few assets and the algorithm keeps cycling the same combinations.

  4. 4
    Frame EU compliance Data / legal team

    In Europe, Consent Mode v2 is mandatory and the campaign remains a black box on placement detail. To be framed on the governance side before scaling.

  5. 5
    Let it converge before judging Google AI

    During learning, the CPA is unstable. Cutting or reworking at this stage means sabotaging the campaign.

The signal that drives it

The imported conversion. If you optimize on gross lead volume rather than leads actually qualified by dealers, the algorithm produces worthless contacts.

How your customers perceive this type of use

Sourced studies

Le pricing algorithmique est le terrain le plus inflammable : 68% des consommateurs disent se sentir leses quand les marques utilisent le pricing dynamique et 80% jugent plus dignes de confiance les marques aux prix constants (Gartner, 2024). L'equite percue varie selon le secteur : le pricing dynamique n'est juge juste que par 33% a 40% des repondants selon qu'il s'agit de concerts ou de cinemas (YouGov, 17 marches). Le prix personnalise par les donnees individuelles est le plus rejete : 47% des Americains s'y opposent fermement (Consumer Reports, 2024).

68%
Consommateurs qui se sentent leses (taken advantage of) quand les marques utilisent le pricing dynamique (2024)
80%
Consommateurs d'accord pour dire que les marques aux prix constants sont plus dignes de confiance (2024)
79%
Consommateurs ayant vecu des situations de prix inattendues sur un an (surge pricing, frais caches, hausses imprevues) (2024)

Acceptance conditions

  • La constance des prix comme signal de confiance : 80% jugent plus fiables les marques aux prix stables (Gartner 2024)
  • Le secteur conditionne l'equite percue : le pricing dynamique est mieux tolere pour les cinemas (40% le jugent juste) que pour les concerts (33%) (YouGov 2024)

Red lines

  • Le pricing dynamique percu comme abus : 68% se sentent leses (Gartner 2024)
  • Le prix individualise a partir des donnees personnelles : 47% d'opposition ferme (Consumer Reports 2024)
  • Les frais caches et hausses imprevues, vecus par 79% des consommateurs sur un an et associes a la perte de confiance (Gartner 2024)

Sources: Gartner 2024 · YouGov 2024 · Consumer Reports 2024

See full acceptance: by country, by use, by generation

How to replicate

Inference, not sourced

Data prerequisites

  • Reliable conversion tracking (qualified leads, not gross)
  • Consent Mode v2 in the EU
  • Differentiated conversion values (lead scoring)

Org prerequisites

  • Video/image/text creative assets in volume
  • Import of lead quality from the CRM

Possible stack

  • Google Ads Performance Max + GA4 + offline conversion import (CRM / Salesforce)
Team to operate1 media buyer (or the agency) + 1 data / CRM profile for the offline import + the creative agency for the assets.

The plan, step by step

  1. Step 1
    Define the real conversion (a lead judged actionable by the dealer, not the form) and connect GA4 + offline conversion import from the CRM.Deliverable: Reliable imported conversion in Google Ads.
  2. Step 2
    Produce the assets in volume (videos, images, hooks) and build the asset groups.Deliverable: Complete asset groups ready to deliver.
  3. Step 3
    Launch Performance Max as an official experiment against the existing campaigns, on a single conversion objective. In the EU, verify Consent Mode v2 before launch.Deliverable: Structured test in delivery.
  4. Step 4
    Let the learning phase pass (4 to 6 weeks) without cutting or reworking.Deliverable: Converged campaign with a stabilized CPA.
  5. Step 5
    Read cost per conversion and volume vs historical campaigns, arbitrate the consolidation, and set the governance (placement transparency).Deliverable: Documented consolidation decision and management rules.

First step: Official Google Ads experiment 'PMax vs existing campaigns' on a single conversion objective, with import of lead quality from the CRM before any scaling.

Sources

  1. S1 Performance Max is the future of marketing - cas Renault Turquie (Renault Mais) Interested party business.google.com · 2022-02 · accessed 2026-07-11 archive pending
  2. S2 ClickThrough reduce Renault Retail Group's CPA by 67% with Performance Max Interested party clickthrough-marketing.com · 2022 · accessed 2026-07-11 archive pending
  3. S3 Groupe Renault boosts sales and reduces cost per lead with Google and Salesforce Interested party marketingplatform.google.com · 2022 · accessed 2026-07-11 archive pending